Memory loss or a difficult diagnosis does not automatically justify interdiction. The legal question focuses on the adult’s ability to make or communicate reasoned decisions and protect their interests.
The adult cannot make safe decisions about care, housing, medication, or necessary treatment.
Bills, property, accounts, or benefits face serious loss because the adult cannot manage them.
Another person may be misusing funds, isolating the adult, or manipulating important decisions.
Grounds for relief: Civil Code Article 389 – full interdiction; Article 390 – limited interdiction.
Full interdiction under Civil Code Article 389 concerns an adult or emancipated minor who, due to an infirmity, cannot consistently make reasoned decisions about the care of both person and property, or communicate those decisions, and whose interests cannot be protected by less restrictive means. Limited interdiction under Article 390 concerns person or property, or an aspect of either, under its stated conditions. The court’s relief must fit the legally established need.
A petition requesting full interdiction must explain why limited relief would not work. It must also describe efforts to use less restrictive measures. Those measures may include a valid Louisiana power of attorney, health care mandate, supported decision-making agreement, trust, or other assistance.
The curator receives the authority granted by the judgment. The court may appoint one curator for personal matters and another for financial affairs.
The undercurator reviews the curator’s actions, receives required filings, and acts as an additional safeguard for the interdict.
A crisis may require faster action. Louisiana law permits temporary relief when immediate and irreparable harm threatens the adult or the adult’s property. Preliminary relief requires an adversarial hearing.
Emergency interdiction is not a shortcut around proof. The request must identify the immediate danger and include required supporting material. See Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 4549.
The adult may oppose the petition. Relatives may also disagree about the need for interdiction or the proposed curator. Other disputes concern spending, care, access, accountings, or whether the curator should remain in office.
An interdiction can later be modified or terminated if the adult’s abilities or circumstances change. Field Law can represent the petitioner, the defendant, a curator, or another interested family member when professional rules permit.
Appointment begins a continuing responsibility. Field Law can advise a curator on the judgment’s limits, records, required reporting, proposed transactions, court approval, and later modification or termination within an agreed engagement.
Code of Civil Procedure Article 4566 governs management of the interdict’s affairs and includes safeguards for particular decisions. A curator should review the requested act rather than assume appointment authorizes every transaction.
Before filing, we connect the requested protection with specific functions the adult cannot consistently perform, available alternatives, and admissible supporting evidence. Medical records, family observations, and financial records require appropriate proof and procedural treatment; collecting them does not guarantee admission or establish the legal grounds.
The proposed engagement identifies the work, fees, expenses, and responsibilities before work begins. The workload depends on the requested protection, service and evidence, hearings, and whether later curator advice is included. Additional proceedings or services require an agreed scope.
Gather the records identified on this page and tell us about any pending deadline or planned transaction. The secure questionnaire starts intake; firm contact follows to discuss a consultation.
No. A diagnosis alone does not determine legal capacity. The court considers what decisions the adult can make, whether the adult can communicate them, and whether less restrictive help can provide protection.
No. A valid mandate may prevent the need for interdiction in many cases. It may not solve abuse, refusal, missing authority, or disputes about the agent.
The court appoints the qualified person best able to perform the role. Louisiana law provides preferences, but the adult’s welfare and the candidate’s qualifications remain important.
No. The judgment and Louisiana law define the curator’s authority. Certain transactions require court approval, supporting evidence, or continuing oversight.
Field Law helps families evaluate interdiction, less restrictive alternatives, emergency concerns, and curator responsibilities.
Page updated October 3, 2026. Attorney information: Morgan Field, Managing Attorney. This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship.