Not every post-judgment problem requires a full reopened administration. The correct procedure depends on what is wrong and what relief the family needs.
Louisiana Code of Civil Procedure Article 3393 permits reopening when other succession property is discovered or another proper cause exists. The court may reappoint the former representative or appoint someone new. Read Article 3393.
Other matters may require supplemental pleadings, a new descriptive list, additional possession relief, or proceedings for another deceased owner. Field Law reviews the complete record before selecting a remedy.
Read more about when a succession can be reopened after judgment.
An old judgment may have been accurate for the information available at the time. Years later, a title search can reveal a different ownership history. A single omitted owner may lead to several additional deaths, marriages, Wills, or intestate successions.
The court record must also match the property records. A judgment that says “all property” may not provide the legal description or ownership detail required for a sale, mortgage, royalty transfer, or title policy.
Obtain the prior pleadings, descriptive list, judgment, Will, deeds, and later title requirements.
Identify omitted property, deceased owners, successors, community-property issues, and conflicting descriptions.
Use the appropriate succession procedure to obtain a recordable and legally supported result.
Corrective succession work often begins with a pending sale. A title company may discover that the seller inherited only part of the property or that a deceased relative remains in the public records.
Field Law coordinates with the owner, realtor, closing attorney, title company, and other counsel. A rushed filing can add another defect. We work backward through the title history before asking the court to act.
A correction may affect ownership percentages or determine who receives valuable property. Interested parties may dispute the original Will, heirship, donations, reimbursements, or transactions that occurred after the first judgment.
We begin with the documents and a defined explanation of the proposed correction. If agreement is not possible, Field Law can use discovery, subpoenas, motions, evidentiary hearings, or appellate review when appropriate.
A wording or calculation problem, an omitted asset, an unopened related estate, and a dispute over substantive ownership are different issues. Reopening a succession is not a universal way to undo a final judgment.
Hypothetical illustration: a closing professional identifies a mismatch between a deed and an old possession judgment. We first compare the legal descriptions, pleadings, judgment, and ownership history. The mismatch may require a permitted judgment amendment, an additional possession proceeding, another succession, or contested relief; the requested transaction does not decide the remedy.
Code of Civil Procedure Article 1951 permits specified non-substantive amendments, with notice and hearing rules; it does not authorize a substantive change by that procedure. Article 3393 addresses opening or reopening for newly discovered property or other proper cause and protects certain good-faith reliance on prior orders.
We define the proposed relief, parties and notice, applicable timing, court work, and agreed recordation or delivery. The age of the file does not answer every deadline or finality question. Detailed ownership-chain and closing coordination belongs on Inherited Property.
The proposed engagement identifies the work, fees, expenses, and responsibilities before work begins. The workload depends on the prior record, notice requirements, number of related estates, remedy, and whether the requested correction is contested. Additional proceedings or services require an agreed scope.
Gather the records identified on this page and tell us about any pending deadline or planned transaction. The secure questionnaire starts intake; firm contact follows to discuss a consultation.
Not necessarily. Age alone does not prevent corrective work. Older cases can require more research because additional owners may have died or records may be incomplete.
The court may reappoint the prior representative or appoint another qualified person. The proper choice depends on availability, qualifications, conflict, and the work required.
Sometimes, but the available procedure depends on whether the issue involves clerical language, omitted property, substantive ownership, fraud, or a contested legal error.
Send the prior judgment, descriptive list, Will, pleadings, relevant deeds, title commitment, and any written explanation from the closing or royalty company.
Field Law handles old, reopened, corrective, and linked Louisiana successions for clients in Louisiana and elsewhere.
Page updated October 3, 2026. Attorney information: Morgan Field, Managing Attorney. This page provides general information and does not create an attorney-client relationship.